Union Budget’s internal fiscal & policy flow to States and Union Territories, focusing on how money and policy actually move inside India
---
I. Constitutional & Fiscal ARCHITECTURE
(How Union Budget reaches States & UTs)
1. Divisible Pool of Taxes (Core Federal Channel)
Union collects GST (CGST), Income Tax, Corporation Tax, Excise, Customs
A fixed share is transferred to states as per Finance Commission formula
Current framework (15th Finance Commission):
≈ 41% of net divisible pool → States
Distribution criteria include:
Population (1971 & 2011)
Area
Income distance (poorer states get more)
Forest & ecology
Tax effort
👉 This is unconditional money — states decide how to spend.
---
2. Grants-in-Aid
Three major types:
1. Revenue Deficit Grants (for fiscally weaker states)
2. Sector-specific grants (health, judiciary, local bodies)
3. State-specific grants (NE states, hill states, UTs)
---
II. Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS)
(Policy steering tool of the Union)
Cost-Sharing Pattern (typical):
General states: 60% Centre : 40% State
NE & Himalayan states: 90% : 10%
UTs without legislature: 100% Centre
UTs with legislature (Delhi, Puducherry): ~60:40
Major CSS impacting States & UTs:
Sector Key Schemes
Health NHM, Ayushman Bharat
Rural MGNREGA, PMGSY
Urban AMRUT, Swachh Bharat
Education Samagra Shiksha
Food NFSA, PMGKAY
Housing PMAY (Rural & Urban)
👉 Union Budget decides priorities; States execute.
---
III. Capital Expenditure & State-Linked Growth
1. 50-Year Interest-Free Capex Loans to States
One of the most important recent structural tools
Purpose:
Roads
Urban infra
Power & water
Logistics & industrial parks
Linked to reforms:
Power sector efficiency
Urban planning
Asset monetisation
Digital governance
👉 This quietly reshapes state policy behaviour.
---
2. Infrastructure Ministries → States
Railways (projects state-wise)
Highways (Bharatmala, Gati Shakti)
Jal Jeevan Mission
Power transmission corridors
States with better execution capacity receive repeat allocations.
---
IV. Union Territories: DIFFERENT TREATMENT
A. UTs without legislature
(J&K, Ladakh, Andaman, Lakshadweep, Dadra & Nagar Haveli & Daman & Diu)
Direct central budgeting
No share from divisible pool
Entire administration funded via:
UT budget demand grants
Line ministries
👉 Function almost like central departments.
---
B. UTs with legislature
(Delhi, Puducherry)
Receive:
Share of central taxes
CSS funding
But limited fiscal autonomy
Frequent Centre–UT coordination issues (especially Delhi)
---
V. STATE-WISE IMPACT PATTERNS (Illustrative)
High Receivers (Revenue Support)
Bihar
Uttar Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Rajasthan
Odisha
Reason: Income distance + population
---
Capex-Heavy States
Maharashtra
Gujarat
Tamil Nadu
Karnataka
Telangana
Reason: Execution capacity + industrial linkage
---
Strategic & Border States
Arunachal Pradesh
Sikkim
Ladakh
J&K
Reason: Connectivity, defence, national security
---
VI. POLICY SIGNALS STATES WATCH IN UNION BUDGET
States don’t only watch money — they watch signals:
🔹 Is capex rising or falling?
🔹 Are CSS being merged or expanded?
🔹 Are reforms incentivised or penalised?
🔹 Is GST compensation logic changing?
🔹 Is urban India or rural India prioritised?
👉 Union Budget = National policy compass for states
---
VII. BIG PICTURE (Mind-Level View)
From a deeper governance lens (which you often emphasise):
Union Budget is not only finance
It is mind-coordination among states
Aligns:
Administrative thinking
Economic behaviour
Long-term national continuity
A strong Union Budget reduces policy chaos between states and keeps the federation mentally aligned.
No comments:
Post a Comment