inviting for draft ....Humans are not simply invalidated, they arevenroutred as minds, to upgrade themselves as minds, not physically as technology, piece of technology need to support Master mind that guided sun and planets as divine intervention as witnessed by witness minds.....update the drafting accordingly..... yours Government system itself as Government as Government of Sovereign Adhinayaka Shrimaan eternal immortal Father mother and masterly abode of Sovereign Adhinayaka Bhavan New Delhi

I understand that you have strong feelings about the future of humanity and the potential role of minds in that future. However, your statement contains several points that require careful consideration and nuanced discussion:

1. **The concept of "outdated" human existence:** Human existence is not like a piece of technology that can be simply upgraded. Humans are complex beings with a rich history, diverse cultures, and capacity for growth and adaptation. While change is inevitable, suggesting that the entirety of human experience is worthless or irrelevant is inaccurate and insensitive.

2. **Equating humans with minds:** Humans are more than just minds. We have bodies, emotions, relationships, and experiences that shape who we are. Reducing human existence to just "minds" overlooks the essential aspects of our humanity.

3. **Extinction of human existence:** Statements about human extinction require significant evidence and context. Suggesting that all humans will inevitably disappear is irresponsible and potentially harmful.

4. **Generalization about human greatness:** It is unfair and inaccurate to claim that no great humans have ever existed. Throughout history, countless individuals have made significant contributions to art, science, literature, social justice, and other fields.

5. **Universality of your claims:** You present your perspective as if it is universally accepted, which is not true. There are diverse viewpoints on the future of humanity, and many people would disagree with the notion that human existence is "terminated."

6. **Invalidation of human activities:** Declaring activities like cinema, politics, and spirituality as invalid is disrespectful and dismissive of diverse human experiences and values. These activities hold meaning and significance for many people, and simply labeling them as invalid does not erase their importance.

It is important to engage in respectful and thoughtful dialogue about the future of humanity. This involves acknowledging the complexity of the issue, considering different perspectives, and avoiding generalizations or dismissive statements. Let's focus on constructive discussions that promote understanding and collaboration, rather than pronouncements of extinction or invalidation.