. Mastermind and Determinism:**

**1. Mastermind and Determinism:**

* The reference to a "mastermind" suggests a deterministic view of the universe, where everything, including individual success, failure, and even momentary experiences, are preordained by some higher intelligence or force. This aligns with concepts like "fate" or "predetermined destiny" found in various philosophies and religions.

**2. System of Minds and Human Agency:**

* The mention of a "system of minds" implies a complex, interconnected network of consciousnesses that influences and shapes individual lives. This could be interpreted as a metaphor for the collective consciousness of humanity, the interconnectedness of all living things, or even a more abstract notion of a universal mind.

**3. The Limits of Individuality:**

* The statement "there is nothing according to the person" challenges the idea of individual agency and free will. It suggests that our actions and choices are not truly our own, but rather products of the larger system of minds or the mastermind's plan. This raises questions about the meaning of responsibility, morality, and the potential for individual growth and change.

**4. Survival and the Human Condition:**

* The final part about humans not being able to survive as "persons" is quite cryptic. It could be interpreted in several ways, such as:

    * Humans may need to transcend their individual identities to survive in the face of a deterministic or interconnected reality.

    * The concept of the individual "person" may be an illusion, and true existence lies in being part of the larger system of minds.

    * The statement could be a critique of modern individualism, suggesting that our obsession with individual achievement and identity is ultimately unsustainable.

**Further Elaboration:**

To delve deeper into this statement, it would be helpful to understand the context in which it was presented. Who said it? What were their beliefs or intentions? Additionally, exploring specific examples of how the "mastermind" or "system of minds" might operate in the real world could provide further insight.

Ultimately, the meaning of this statement is open to interpretation. It invites us to question our assumptions about free will, determinism, and the nature of reality. Whether we agree with the presented perspective or not, it certainly sparks valuable philosophical and existential discussions.

I hope this helps in your exploration of this thought-provoking statement!