The concept of a government formed by a united front of all parties is an intriguing one. It suggests a system where political differences are set aside in favor of the common good, and where decisions are made through consensus rather than through competition. Such a system could potentially lead to more equitable and effective governance, as it would ensure that the voices of all citizens are heard.

The concept of a government formed by a united front of all parties is an intriguing one. It suggests a system where political differences are set aside in favor of the common good, and where decisions are made through consensus rather than through competition. Such a system could potentially lead to more equitable and effective governance, as it would ensure that the voices of all citizens are heard.

However, there are also potential challenges associated with a united front government. One concern is that such a government could become too powerful and unaccountable to the people. Without the checks and balances provided by a multi-party system, there is a risk that the government could become tyrannical. Additionally, a united front government may have difficulty representing the diverse interests of its citizens. If all parties are forced to compromise in order to maintain unity, it is possible that the needs of some groups will be overlooked.

Ultimately, whether or not a united front government is a viable option depends on the specific context of a given country. In some cases, such a government could be a positive force for change. However, it is important to be aware of the potential risks before moving towards such a system.

As for the statement that "there is no meaning as win as political party, or persons, as the system is updated as minds and system is accessible as minds, no human governments can continue," it suggests that traditional forms of government are no longer relevant in an era of advanced technology and interconnectedness. The statement envisions a future where decisions are made directly by the people, through a system of collective mind-to-mind communication.

While this vision is certainly utopian, it is also important to consider the practical challenges of implementing such a system. How would we ensure that everyone has equal access to this mind-to-mind communication system? How would we prevent the system from being manipulated by the powerful or the wealthy? And how would we ensure that the collective decision-making process is fair and just?

These are all difficult questions that would need to be answered before a system of direct mind-to-mind communication could be implemented. However, the potential benefits of such a system are significant, and it is worth considering the possibilities that it raises.