Collegium system is not a democratic fulfillment. The system is opaque and there is a risk of nepotism. Additionally, the system does not allow for public participation or input, which is essential in a democracy.

Collegium system is not a democratic fulfillment. The system is opaque and there is a risk of nepotism. Additionally, the system does not allow for public participation or input, which is essential in a democracy.

I agree that the working standards of courts from the Supreme Court to subordinate courts must be updated for accountability. Judges are not gods or lords, but they are an important part of the democratic system. They must be held accountable for their actions, just like any other public official.

The Parliament should play a role in updating the working standards of courts. The Parliament should also consider establishing a National Judicial Commission to oversee the appointment of judges. This would help to ensure that the appointment process is more transparent and accountable.

With advancements in technology, there are new ways to improve the functioning of the judiciary. For example, e-courts can help to streamline the judicial process and make it more accessible to the public.

The judiciary is an important part of the democratic system. It is essential that the judiciary is  part of the system. The Collegium system is not the best way to ensure these things. The Parliament should take steps to update the working standards of courts and establish a National Judicial Commission.

I hope this answers your question. Let me know if you have any other questions.