Wednesday, 25 June 2025

A snapshot that speaks volumes about domestic sentiment, political trends, and the changing nature of leadership across the globe. Here's a brief analysis and context for these numbers based on regions and notable leaders:

A snapshot that speaks volumes about domestic sentiment, political trends, and the changing nature of leadership across the globe. Here's a brief analysis and context for these numbers based on regions and notable leaders:


---

๐Ÿ” Top-Tier Approval (60% and above)

1. ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ป Nayib Bukele (El Salvador) – 91%

Why so high? Crackdown on gangs, security reforms, and a strong digital vision. However, concerns exist over authoritarian tendencies and erosion of democratic checks.



2. ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Vladimir Putin (Russia) – 80%

Largely bolstered by state-controlled narratives, nationalism, and suppression of dissent. External sanctions and war narratives influence this figure domestically.



3. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Narendra Modi (India) – 78%

Strong nationalist appeal, economic reforms, and global visibility, despite criticisms around minority rights and centralization of power.



4. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Javier Milei (Argentina) – 60%

His outsider persona and radical economic reforms have energized a frustrated electorate facing inflation, though sustainability of popularity remains to be seen.





---

๐ŸŸก Mid-Tier Approval (40–59%)

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Mark Carney (assumed or potential future PM) – 56%

๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Anthony Albanese (Australia) – 53%

๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Claudia Sheinbaum (Mexico) – 52%

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Donald Trump (USA) – 50% (note: as a candidate/former president)

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Giorgia Meloni (Italy) – 42%

๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Bart de Wever (Belgium) – 41%

๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Donald Tusk (Poland) – 40%

๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Cyril Ramaphosa (South Africa) – 40%


This tier reflects mixed perceptions:

Economic performance, governance challenges, or recent transitions (e.g., Sheinbaum’s election, Carney’s speculative leadership) can affect these ratings.

In the U.S., Trump’s 50% reflects strong party loyalty despite legal and social controversies.



---

๐Ÿ”ป Low-Tier Approval (below 40%)

Includes leaders of traditionally stable democracies:

๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Friedrich Merz (Germany) – 36%

๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Pedro Sรกnchez (Spain) – 34%

๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Ulf Kristersson (Sweden) – 34%

๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Lula da Silva (Brazil) – 34%

๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Recep Tayyip Erdogan (Turkey) – 33%

๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Keir Starmer (UK) – 27%

๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Shigeru Ishiba (Japan) – 22%

๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Emmanuel Macron (France) – 18%

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Petr Fiala (Czech Republic) – 16%


These ratings often reflect:

Political polarization

Economic stagnation or inflation

Immigration and social unrest

Public dissatisfaction with the status quo



---

๐Ÿง  Takeaways:

High ratings (e.g., Bukele, Modi) tend to correlate with strongman images or visible action (security/economy), whether democratic or otherwise.

Lower ratings in Western Europe and Japan suggest governance fatigue and disillusionment with centrist or technocratic politics.

The rise of populist or unconventional leaders (Milei, Trump, Bukele) signals a continued global appetite for alternatives to traditional politics.



---

If you’d like, I can break this down into visual charts or compare it with previous years to track trends over time. Would you like a regional heatmap or ranking chart?

No comments:

Post a Comment